'Chariots of Fire' review: "Overrated Olympics movie with great score"
Published Jul 9 2012, 17:14 BST | By Ben Rawson-Jones
Ask various folks their opinion of Chariots of Fire and many will recount being moved to epiphany by the breathtaking beachside running sequence set to a majestic score by Vangelis and the fact this move won the 'Best Picture' Oscar back in 1981. They're not wrong.
But while that iconic scene still retains its evocative power in 2012, the year of the movie's cinematic rerelease to coincide with the Olympics, the rest belies dreamy nostalgia and instead reveals itself to be a largely unengaging and tedious tale of toff ciphers running around and gurning in slow motion as they stretch for the finishing line. Not even Nigel Havers in the throes of youthful foppishness can save this one.
Director Hugh Hudson's background in commercials lends itself well to the depiction of athletes in motion. This aesthetic brilliance, coupled with a staggeringly superb score by Vangelis, ensures that the audience is mesmerised for these sequences and feels the anguish and ecstasy etched on the competitors faces - whether it be on the beach, in a courtyard at university or at the Olympics. Yet there is a surprising lack of emotional investment in the protagonists that leaves one with a sense of hollowness.

Outside of the running arena, the characters have all the life of shop window mannequins. Hudson's painfully static camera strips every conversational scene of any energy, although the actors appear incredibly wooden. It's hard to tell whether they're doing Colin Welland's screenplay a disservice, or whether the dialogue is simply so stilted that their performances stand no chance.
Frequent bursts of religious sermonising also recall the agony of sitting through an uncomfortably overlong and dull speech at a school assembly. Worst of all is a romantic subplot between Harold and singer Sybil (Alice Krige), which makes you wonder whether you're watching one of those French and Saunders parodies of period drama and its nuanced acting. At least Ian Holm imbues his role as running coach Sam Mussabini with both dignity and loyalty, although he still feels like a caricature.
Chariots of Fire is best enjoyed through the medium of YouTube, watching that stunning opening sequence along the shore, and by grabbing hold of the genial soundtrack. As for sitting through the entire two-hour movie, it's an uncomfortable reminder of how the memory can cheat and the Academy Awards can favour nostalgic sentimentalism over strong storytelling.










Really? I wept buckets the first time I saw it.
July 15th 2012 at 6:03pm
Leaden? Are you sure you know what that word means? Lackwit!
July 13th 2012 at 1:55pm
Having been to the premier of the remastered Chariots of Fire in London last night I can say that everyone around me (all hard nosed film industry colleagues) and I were all in tears at the end. This is a fantastic film. It has a wonderful script, beautiful cinematography, fantastic performances, is brilliantly directed and that incredible score. This film has everything that is needed to earn the title of a classic. This review is utter nonsense!
July 11th 2012 at 4:12pm
I remember running all the way home on the wings of gods after seeing the film.
My sad note was I could have been in the film as a extra . The return to Portsmouth was filmed at York railway station.
July 11th 2012 at 10:40am(+1 like)
Only Digital Spy could give the 3D Katy Perry movie a higher score than a classic like Chariots of Fire.
July 11th 2012 at 1:23am(+3 likes)