Piranha 3D
Published Aug 20 2010, 00:00 BST | By Mayer Nissim

© Dimension Films
A wonderful pre-credits sequence features a 'Show Me the Way To Go Home'-singing Richard Dreyfuss reprising his role from Jaws, the movie the original Piranha ripped off back in 1978. It's a nice touch, and is one of several nods and winks to the genre sprinkled across the (thankfully) swift 89 minute runtime. In fact, the movie is bookended with plenty of material that could have been spliced from any similar film from the late '70s on, with various characters in peril from the deadly freshwater creatures. There's the dorky-but-hip Pixies/Lou Reed/Ramones/Radiohead-loving Jake (Steven R. McQueen), out on a boat with (girl)friend Kelly (Jessica Szohr), porn director Derrick (Jerry O'Connell) and his babes Crystal (Rachel Riley) and Danni (Kelly Brook). There's Jake's two younger siblings, stranded on an island after sneaking off in a boat when left alone. There's Jake's sheriff mum Julie (Elisabeth Shue), her friend (Adam Scott) and her Deputy (Ving Rhames).
Where the movie lurches from the tension/release template is a half-hour sequence at the centre which justifies the film's 18 certificate - and then some. While our characters are off in the middle distance, a few hundred horrible teens suffer a full-on attack from the flesh-eating fiends. The movie's press notes name Aja as one of the lamentable/self-indulgent/cynical "splat pack", and the segment is all your Saws and Hostels come at once. Death-after-death-after-death-after-death. You don't know the characters, so the only way to elicit a reaction is by distinguishing each scene with a more innovative and icky, squelchy end. The computer-generated piranha are about as scary as goldfish, so there's a necessary focus on the chomped flesh and straggling bones. That soon wears thin, so we get other nasty methods of being stripped, sliced and diced - from swinging cables bisecting a naked woman, to a motorboat propeller ripping someone's face off, to fellow splat-packer Eli Roth making hair-raising cameo. It's a franchise worth's of Final Destination death scenes condensed into half an hour, in close-up.
Without wanting to channel one's inner Mary Whitehouse, there comes a point where you can't decide whether you're bored or nauseous, or a little bit of both. The thrill of a well-timed bit of yuck is just lost after the first half dozen. Worse still, the onslaught douses any suspense there might be in the prospect of the lead characters getting snaffled. Lovely as they are, it's hard to worry about Kelly Brook's bits getting chomped because you've just been completely desensitised by tens of teens being ripped to bits in so very many horrible ways. Out-and-out gore fans will absolutely love it, of course. It's a popcorn flick, and the bonus is that once you've finished snacking, those tubs can double up as a handy sickbag.
The 3D is a disappointment. Despite the attendant gloom actually complementing the film's B-movie leanings and underwater setting, there isn't nearly enough sticking-out pokey bits to warrant the specs. The much-discussed, naked underwater snog scene between a flippered Crystal and Dannii somehow manages to be completely unsexy, set as it is to a classical aria and perhaps sensibly being played for laughs. On the plus side, there's Christopher Lloyd's movie-stealing scenes as an excitable fish expert called on to explain the prehistoric piranha. He throws himself into the role of a crazed professor with undisguised glee, and he chews up his lines with every bit as much vigour as the on-screen nasties. "Piranha hunt in packs," he rasps. "The first bite draws blood... the blood draws... the PACK!" But, whether or not you enjoy Piranha 3D will pretty much come down to how you feel about a sight gag consisting of two CGI piranha fighting over a recently-dismembered CGI penis. Like the fish, I just couldn't swallow it.

> What do you think of the movie? Share your views
Previous
Marmaduke








Now of course men liked this movie because it was about lesbians and naked women. This movie was basically a porno. Okay the audience got the point when the guy said he was a porno director but really was all those naked scenes and lesbian scenes of ONLY women REALLY necessary? This should've been a NR movie or just a porno. Anyways it wasn't scary or amusing to me just another guy movie where it 's provocative to women and pushing more girls to become sl*ts and lesbians. Smh. Trashy dirty movie. And it's really offensive to girls like me because this that will just make people look down on girls even more. The sad part is that I'm 15 year old girl I haven't even started my adult life and to see how my future will be with all these men movies is just disgusting. Damn this should've been just another corny old chick flick -_-
February 17th 2011 at 5:15pm
This film is like 90s US TV show, The Real World VS Lake Placid but with fish...
I really enjoyed it - but then my expectations were pretty low. That they played most scenes for laughs increased the enjoyability factor for me.
Where it did fall short was the 3D element - just as the reviewer says, there was nothing coming out of the screen towards you, which only went to highlight the fact that 3D technology was tagged on in post-production. Had they shot the film with that in mind, it could have been a lot better.
Also, a lot of the underwater deaths get lost due to the frenetic camerawork (which makes sense as these fish aren't casual diners), and the murky, bloody water. You do end up feeling quite detatched.
When it is played for laughs, whether it be the penis scene, or the paraglider, or the girl in the ring, the film seems to find its feet. And considering the low budget feel to the movie, they've managed to find themselves some relatively high profile B-list actors and actresses - Ving Rhames, Richard Dreyfuss, Christopher LLoyd, Elizabeth Shue who all happily ham it up in their relatively stereotyped roles.
I'd hardly say Lloyd's scenes make the movie though. That comment smacks of 'must say that to keep the readers happy'...
September 15th 2010 at 11:52am
A vile tasteless piece of trash. Seriously. The most horrifying thing about it is that the filmmakers are clearly competent people, and definitely intended to make this thing exactly as it is. Personally, I love a good bit of violence and the occasional bouncing breast, but this...this...thing I just watched is gratuitous to a fault. It's the grossest thing I've seen since "Planet Terror" in "Grindhouse", a film I very much enjoyed, a film this flick wanted to be and could have been, had it been made by people with dignity.
September 3rd 2010 at 3:57am
Loved it! I am a fan of the 'splatter' films so all of the blood and death scenes were right up my alley. The film didnt pretend to be anything it wasnt, it was funny, trashy and awesome!
September 1st 2010 at 8:56pm
Why is everyone taking this film so seriously? This is a must see for a good laugh at the cinema. If you want a really scary film, this is not for you however if you want some B-class entertainment this is perfect. Possibly the best film this year - you will definitely get many laughs!
August 29th 2010 at 2:00pm