'Batman' revisited: Tim Burton's 'Batman' and 'Batman Returns'
Published Jul 16 2012, 09:00 BST | By Paul Martinovic
To celebrate the arrival of The Dark Knight Rises in cinemas on Friday (July 20), over the next three days Digital Spy will be guiding you through a look back at six of the Dark Knight's previous cinematic outings.Under the stewardship of three very different directors - Tim Burton, Joel Schumacher, and Christopher Nolan - the Batman of the big screen has had undergone vastly different guises. Some are beguiling, some are baffling - and some have nipples on them.
Today, we start with a look back at Tim Burton's Batman and Batman Returns.

© Rex Features / SNAP
Batman (1989)
Despite the caped crusader's big screen debut taking place 23 years earlier in the 1966 adaptation of the garishly camp television show, the Batman dynasty properly kicked off here, along with, arguably, the modern superhero film as we know it.
While Richard Donner's brilliant Superman came over a decade earlier, Batman's portrayal of a darker, more tormented superhero is much closer in structure to the dozens of comic book films that have dominated blockbusters over the past decade. Equally influential was the film's incredibly aggressive marketing campaign, which made the Bat-logo ubiquitous during the summer of 1989 and led to enormous box office takings.

The film itself however fails to stand up - the script is lifeless, with a story it's hard to invest in, and there's a confused sense about the whole film. Hardly surprising, seeing as during production the oddball Gothic instincts of Burton would consistently run up against the strictly commercially-minded attitude of producer Jon Peters and screenwriter Sam Hamm's desire to remain faithful to the source material. Chuck in Jack Nicholson's legendarily OTT performance as the Joker and a bizarrely inappropriate Prince soundtrack, and it's no wonder the film often feels like a directionless mess.
Despite this, there are still things to enjoy here - Anton Furst's production design is remarkable, Danny Elfman's instantly recognisable score is one of his best, and there are some undeniably iconic sequences, not least the Joker/Jack Napier's post-surgery mirror smashing. Michael Keaton also proves a surprisingly good choice for the title role - he's excellent as Bruce Wayne, the eccentric billionaire alter-ego, and while he is somewhat less effective as Batman that's largely down to Burton, who seems far less interested in the titular character than he does in his showier, freakier nemesis.
Far from a classic, then, and badly dated, but the Batman series was to see much better - and much worse - to come.

Batman Returns (1992)
While the Joker dominated Batman, Batman Returns seems even less interested in his hero than ever before - he barely appears on screen for the film's opening hour, as Burton introduces viewers to a newer, even weirder rogues gallery than before. Just as well, then, that all three are brilliant creations bolstered by some iconic performances.
There's Christopher Walken on typically good form as the odious, shock-haired businessman Max Shreck; Danny DeVito utterly committing to the repulsive Oswald Cobblepot, aka The Penguin; and Michelle Pfieffer superbly portraying Selina Kyle as she transforms from put-upon dormouse to the vampish and deadly Catwoman.
The block-busting success of Batman meant that Burton had much freer reign creatively than in the first film, and it shows - this is a film of freaks, animals, monsters, and misfits. It often feels less of a Tim Burton take on the Batman universe than it does a Batman film that takes place in the Burton universe.

Despite this,the film's greatest asset over its predecessor is probably its script, which is much cleverer and wittier thanks to screenwriter Daniel Waters. He brings some much-needed snappy dialogue to proceedings, and mixes elements of sexual politics and corporate satire alongside the now-familiar blend of fantasy and film noir.
Batman Returns achieved notoriety at the time for its adult content in what was essentially a children's film, with some of the most luridly grotesque content of any of the Batman films. Despite this, with its outrageous costumes and one-liners it's a film as deeply rooted in camp as the '60s version, only replacing the 'Ka-pows!' with splashy gore and grue.
It's by no means perfect - Burton cannot direct action to save his life - and as a Batman film it fails to fulfil some of the most basic criteria for long-term fans. It's still a highly entertaining watch in its own right, and of the pre-Nolan Batman films it remains easily the most rewarding to revisit.

Check back in tomorrow (July 17) as we look back at Joel Schumacher's two entries into the Batman franchise, Batman Forever and Batman and Robin.
Watch the trailer for The Dark Knight Rises below:









Just took in this line - "Burton cannot direct action to save his life." If you think his handling of action sequences is bad, I'd love to know what you think of Chris Nolan's extreme close-up shaky-cam shenanigans...
July 18th 2012 at 3:35am(+1 like)
Ridiculous. One of the best things about Batman is the script - it's packed with memorable dialogue. It's easy to invest in the plot; it's a lean revenge thriller focusing on the mirror image of the Joker and Batman, the duality of their identities and relationship between them. And Keaton was great in both guises, not just as Bruce Wayne; think of the "I'm Batman!" moment when he holds a terrified criminal aloft near the beginning. He was the first actor to have the idea to disguise his voice when donning the cowl. I suspect the reviewer is in thrall to the newer iteration; the only thing dated about this film is the Prince songs, and they're easy to ignore.
July 18th 2012 at 3:23am(+2 likes)
Did the reviewer even WATCH Batman?
"and it's no wonder the film often feels like a directionless mess"
Jeez
July 17th 2012 at 4:56pm(+3 likes)
Agree with Batman. It should have been called "The Joker." This is his movie; how he was created, his struggles to achieve his goals, the villain (Batman) trying to stop him...
And it's what really bugs me about it. Take TDK. Yes, it's Joker heavy, but it's still Batman's movie. Everything the Joker and Batman do is in response to each other; it's a deadly game, with the Joker always one step ahead until the very end.
July 17th 2012 at 12:02am
The Joker often overpowers any Batman story....and don't tell me the thing that most people were talking about or even went to watch TDK in the first place wasn't because of The Joker!?!
July 17th 2012 at 5:38pm(+2 likes)
Over on the Escapist MovieBob has been doing a similar weekly feature over the last few weeks across his 'The Big Picture' webisodes talking about the series and some of the behind the scenes aspects about why the creative direction was changed from the Burton style into the camp style. It's great stuff.
July 16th 2012 at 3:53pm
Nice article here too also
July 16th 2012 at 3:53pm